tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-14053277.post3040329792301384075..comments2011-02-04T05:43:28.880-08:00indscribehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/17073543434209800940noreply@blogger.comBlogger12125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-14053277.post-65141816027373099782011-02-03T13:08:58.610-08:002011-02-03T13:08:58.610-08:00I have seen this story on screen :). Its been very well captured in movie &#39;himayun&#39; , ashok kumar is in the role of himayun, and prithvi raj kapoor in the role of Babar. if you are in india you should get DVDs of this 1946 movie, if you are outside in india then search torrents :)Raghu Yadavnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-14053277.post-44834313060940798282010-06-17T05:35:41.162-07:002010-06-17T05:35:41.162-07:00All right lets just say muslim invaders( Id rather say afghan or turkish) did destroy temples massacred hindus( especially at the hindu kush mountains) what do the present muslims have to do with it. Did they ask those block heads back then to do all sorts of nasty stuff. No they did not. you may say all muslims praise barbarians like mohammed ghur,Ghazni, aurangazeb etc. correction it is not all muslims it is few muslims( very few to be precise, may be 2% of muslim population).So what i ask is why dont we leave such stuff behind in history. just let it go.<br /><br /> we must remember that we are all same ol&#39; indians( we all have similar genetic make up that means an indians from any religion are more similar to each other than maybe to a chinese or an african person) with just differemt ways of thinking but similar mindsets none the less.<br /><br />Jai hindIndiannoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-14053277.post-79037445955360035682009-08-21T03:39:43.058-07:002009-08-21T03:39:43.058-07:00Namatse,<br /><br />Thanks for sharing this piece of history. I will share this with my friends. <br /><br />Jai Hind,<br />RaghuRaghavendra Kulkarni (Raghu)http://www.blogger.com/profile/13034129495348389915noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-14053277.post-78882113088186993512009-07-13T02:33:11.454-07:002009-07-13T02:33:11.454-07:00Its good to see such blogs where hindu and muslim bondage is shown...Raksha Bandhanhttp://www.dgreetings.com/rakhi/noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-14053277.post-37951118099853661482009-03-29T05:52:00.000-07:002009-03-29T05:52:00.000-07:00I like this one - in fact when I was small I read this story - and for me humayun was hero .Humayun was very unfortunate ruler who never had peace of mind .<BR/><BR/>But there was another part of the Muslim invasion of India - as a victor there was a lot of blood shed - lot of Hindus killed and there temple destroyed - this is also a history - so we should not forget this.<BR/><BR/>Ruler like AKBAR ,sahajahan , jahangir were pragmatic in their approach as to rule india they have to adopt conciliatory approach towards local rulers - divide and rule - which British did to perfection.<BR/><BR/>Anyway its true that a great cultural progress has been made in terms of language , architect , music and art during mugal rule .<BR/><BR/>Ans friendship between mugal and rajpoots were legendary.<BR/><BR/>shivaji indeed had lot of afgan as soldiers - but they were not mugals.<BR/><BR/>tHERE is also truth behind destruction of mny important temples of hindus and genocide of millions of hindus by afgans and later mugals - and most of the time this had religios undertone as new rulers of india Muslim want to consolidate their power - so forced conversion , destruction of temples , marrying to local girls all was part of that - i think any aggresor would do that .prabhathttp://www.blogger.com/profile/12061036877271698071noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-14053277.post-80544221910690655882009-03-22T17:45:00.000-07:002009-03-22T17:45:00.000-07:00To the first post:<BR/><BR/>History books have been whitewashed too to support the claim that the invaders of India did more bad than good. Victory is defined by the victorious. <BR/>Just Read "Higher education, ideology, and politics" by Pinto, Ambrose (2004). <BR/><BR/>And, no conquest or invasion has been without bloodshed. There was in-fighting among Hindu rulers as well; its not like the Muslim rulers were the only ones who led bloody wars. <BR/><BR/>Even Hinduism has the concept of wars. According to Hindu philosophy, there exists a continuous tension between dharmayuddha and kutayuddha.<BR/><BR/>Please people, inform yourselves, read some books and think for yourself and go out and vote. Don't let anyone else make decisions for you.A Pragmatist/Academicnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-14053277.post-84439663007092791642009-02-17T20:11:00.000-08:002009-02-17T20:11:00.000-08:00The post is really laudable. There is also a poem written by Bengli poet narrating this entire incident.<BR/>Another much forgotten and even less spoken character who had done a lot to promote unity and peace was Shahzada Dara Shiko. But unfortunately it is one of the reasons for which he was brutally murdered by Aurangzeb. However, sadly, there is no effort to promote Dara Shiko, neither by Indian politicans nor by Hindus or Muslims. Instead, Aurangzeb is probably more popular because of his orthodoxy.shannoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-14053277.post-34131689502798789132009-01-23T01:38:00.000-08:002009-01-23T01:38:00.000-08:00wonderful post. My complements. Some of the comments though are not too pleasing. we need more people like you to preach universal brotherhood and bon homie between religious groups. I did read about or was told about this Rakhi incident by my teachers in school. thank you for reminding us.Cool4uhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/15024414607422013773noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-14053277.post-59734446111959912902009-01-16T02:28:00.000-08:002009-01-16T02:28:00.000-08:00such a beautiful post followed by such hate filled bigotted comments.<BR/><BR/>This speaks of our sad times if nothing else does.<BR/><BR/>By the way, reading this brought a smile as i remebered you muslim bhaiPinkuhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/06714914168230658950noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-14053277.post-24770414065526489282008-08-18T20:04:00.000-07:002008-08-18T20:04:00.000-07:00why some people close their eyes to history..they just see wot they wnt to see..<BR/><BR/>akbar followed tolerant policy and most mughals followed that .<BR/>hindustani music evolved flourished during mughal era.<BR/>. i think no king has lived for relgion but for expansion of land..<BR/>even great shivaji looted surat.<BR/><BR/>aurangzeb had more 100 amirs(amir= leader of more than 1000 horse ridersand same with shivaji he 99 amir which were afghan.<BR/>can now somebody tell me it awas war between hindu muslims. that was for territory ..aurangzeb grand son and sambhaji son together fought against aurangzeb.<BR/>tipu the hero of all time was fighting against british .<BR/>maratha and british together fought to defeat tipu. and where does hindu swarajya goes..<BR/>actually we painted rajas and king for our purpose .they were mere ambitious kings..<BR/>problem with so called hnduwadis is they dont want know truth.their knowledge is limited read about world islam arabs romans mongols aryans.<BR/>even aryan were from outside they suprssed dravidians.<BR/>sher shah surri was great administrator even now govt is following old rules which he started. he brought discipline vilage taluka levels .revenue system..etc..<BR/>wake up guys say black is black and white is white..<BR/>dont see ur own color<BR/><BR/>aslam saiyadaslam saiyadnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-14053277.post-50892064045211009882008-08-17T11:58:00.000-07:002008-08-17T11:58:00.000-07:00@anony<BR/>I wonder what caused the lapse in your memory. You seem to have forgotten all the atrocities of the British in the middle ages. You always jump from Mughals to Pakistan forgiving the British in between. No wonder you earn the tag of 'tolerant' from the west. You never give a damn to the alleged 'Dogs and Indians are not allowed' written by them. The bullets given to Hindu and Muslim soldiers by the British. Do you ever wonder if your thinking is free after winning the freedom? Or, is it a so called freedom??urdudaaNhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/15797516569362933089noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-14053277.post-38122692939270612342008-08-16T21:22:00.000-07:002008-08-16T21:22:00.000-07:00The whitewashing of atrocities perpetrated by muslim invaders is so stark in our history books, in our movies, literature etc its pretty amazing.<BR/>Only recently you had a downright fictional movie about Akbar which painted him as some secular, enlightened individual instead of the debauched character that he actually was. All his wives were converted to Islam, not what was shown in the movie. No mention of his harems either, or his war mongering. Same whitewashing was done in earlier mughal-e-azam also.<BR/><BR/>We never learnt of the horrific temple destruction carried out by Aurangzeb in our history books. Or the destruction of Somnath, not once but six times by muslim invaders. Or that of Nalanda, or Vijayanagar.. the list is endless.<BR/><BR/>What you write of composite culture is nonsense. The subcontinent has never seen much peace since the onset of muslims. Get rid of the fantasy. Look at whats happening in Kashmir for more proof.<BR/><BR/>The only practical solution is another partition in which Hindus and Muslims are completely separated so that we can go our own ways.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com