...

...

Search This Blog

Loading...

Tuesday, July 19, 2016

When Maoists terror strikes, no tears for martyrs, media too ignores it: The killers are termed 'Rebel', not militant or terrorist

Maoists killed ten CRPF commandos in Bihar, however, the news failed to interest media.

Initial figure was that 8 Cobra Commandos had been killed and later the figure rose to 10.

In a country like ours where those throwing stone at police or security personnel in Kashmir are termed terrorists, it is surprising that DEATH OF ARMY PERSONNEL hardly evokes any response.

Those who killed the CRPF jawans were NOT termed 'Terrorist' or even 'Militant'. The words used were 'REBEL' other than 'NAXALS' and Maoists. The double standards are clearly visible. There is no love for soldier's life.

A soldier or a jawan killed anywhere in India doesn't anger you. You care least for his life. It's harsh but it's a fact. But you only get agitated in Kashmir, because here it has been termed a 'Hindu-Muslim problem'.

No tears for Martyrs

There were no tears shed for the jawans. In fact, 'national' media and newspapers ignored the news. For TV channels that are quick to call administration in Bihar, synonymous to 'Jungle-Raj' after every crime, such killings didn't lead to any fury.

One national paper gave it 'six lines' in brief on front page at the bottom. The other national paper too gave it similar treatment--brief on front page. The third national newspaper didn't have it on front page, at all.

So when there is no Hindu-Muslim issue, you are indifferent. Just like Article 370 which angers you. But Article 371 is not of your concern. That you can't go to some North Eastern states without permit, doesn't bother you because these three states don't have the same communal angle here.

[Photo is symbolic, for representational purpose only]


Saturday, July 16, 2016

Real story of Kashmir: Why 'national media' doesn't show reality of Kashmir

Kashmir [Jammu-Kashmir] is our 'Atoot Ang'--that's what we grew up, listening.

But from childhood, we have heard lies and fed with propaganda on Kashmir. We are not told the truth about Kashmir.

Probably, that's one of the reasons that the lies have given way to such hate, that when Kashmiris die, many people seem to revel and talk about 'score', as if 30 deaths is an achievement of the India or Army.

Kashmir is ours but Kashmiri is not. Kids grew up listening to propaganda that Kashmiris are anti-India, that they are never satisfied, that they enjoy special status, that they live off on Indian tax-payers' money and so on.

When generations imbibe this as truth, what happens? The result is that the pain of the Kashmiri doesn't affect you at all. When kids are dying in Kashmir, you don't feel anything.

On Facebook, in WhatsApp groups, on Twitter, in Drawing room conversations, you feel that the Kashmiri deserves the bullets and pellets and every second person seems to be baying for the blood of Kashmiris.

You want Kashmir, the territory, but you hate the Kashmiri. Strange.

PROPAGANDA, FALSEHOODS & ROLE OF TV CHANNELS, MEDIA

The decade of eighties saw militancy peak in Jammu & Kashmir. It was the same period when Kashmiri Pandits had to leave the Valley--a sad chapter in the history of J&K.

It was also the era when BJP leaders, riding high on Ram Mandir movement, used Kashmir in their speeches to create the Hindu wave. DD was still the sole TV channel.

Poison was being spread in the society but Congress, which had mishandled Ram Temple-Babri Masjid dispute, remained mute spectator while hate and propaganda about Kashmir was being spread across North India.

TV channels came nearly a decade later. But by then, there was a generation that had grown up on the diet that made them see Kashmiris as enemy. What else was the reason that TV channels never showed the reality of Kashmir.

Unfortunately, Indian media has this dubious distinction of misinforming own people and teaching them how to hate your own country-men. This is a result of institutional misinformation and hate over decades.

ARTICLE 370, BJP PROPAGANDA AND IT's IMPACT

For the BJP, Article 370 was just an electoral issue to polarise people. Its leaders talked of Ram Temple, Article 370 and Common Civil Code, as if they were the three magic words that would transform the country.

Today, BJP is again at the helm in the country, and also shares the power in J&K. But what about article 370? It's still there. In the name of Article 370, BJP leaders injected so much hate among an entire generation, that talking about Kashmir issue and the sufferings of ordinary Kashmiris, has become nearly impossible even among friends.

When BJP leaders were taking out 'yatras' and issuing war cries over Article 370, Congress leaders remained silent and seemed to have no clue how to deal with it. Jawaharlal Nehru was blamed for Kashmir crisis but unfortunately Congress seemed to have no idea how to counter-attack or clarify its position.

Political class, media kept mum over 'permit needed to enter North Eastern States

Neither politicians, nor media, bothered to report from the ground and tell Indians that how Kashmir had been mishandled, how Kashmiris were living, what they suffered, what they expected and the reality of the special status on the ground.

While outsiders can't buy land in Kashmir, it is not something unique to J&K. Outsiders can't buy land in parts of North East, in many hill stations, regions inhabited by indigenous people.

Further, while anyone can go to Kashmir, most Indians can't even enter several North Eastern states. A permit [inner line permit] is needed to enter these states. Why BJP never raised these issues or talked about integration?

So no voice was ever raised about Article 371, as it pertains to Nagalnad, which is too far. And, because there wasn't enough scope to polarise and gain voters in heartland by raking up the issue. 

Nothing works more than a Hindu-Muslim angle. Our intelligentsia, entire political class also failed. BJP managed to convince majority of people in North India, at least, the urban Hindu, that Kashmiris were pampered....

[Continued]

SHORT BRIEF OF THIS POST IN HINDI, URDU

मुख्यधारा में लाना तो दूर की बात कश्मीर के बारे में इतने झूट बोले गए, भाजपा ने धारा 370 को लेकर अस्सी के दशक से जो उन्माद फैलाया उसने नार्थ इंडिया के शहरी बहुसंख्यकों के दिल में कश्मीरियों के लिए नफरत भर दी. धारा 371 की कभी बात नहीं की गयी. जनता को कौन बताता कि ज़मीन तो और पहाड़ी इलाकों में भी नहीं खरीदी जा सकती बल्कि नार्थईस्ट के कई राज्यों में तो भारतीय शहरी को दाखिल होने के लिए परमिट की ज़रुरत होती है. मगर वहां मुस्लिम आबादी नहीं है और भावनाएं तो हिन्दू-मुस्लिम से ही भड़कती हैं....

کشمیر کی حقیقت-1
کشمیر کو لے کر اتنے جھوٹ بولے گۓ کہ شمالی ہند کے شہری ہندو کے دل میں کشمیری کے لئے نفرت گھر کر گئ۔ دھارا 370 کو لے کر بی جے پی نے سالوں نفرت کی سیسات کی مگر دھارا 371 کی کبھی بات نہیں کی۔ ان سیاستدانوں نے کبھی عوام کو نہیں بتایا کہ اس ملک کے کئ حصہ ایسے ہیں جہاں جانے کے لیئے عام ہندوستانی کو پرمٹ کی ضرورت پڑتی ہے۔۔۔

Thursday, July 14, 2016

How Muslims became so poor in India: Any example of 'ruling class' losing dominance, power in any other country?

Governing_India is a Twitter handle that mostly tweets on politics and policies.

It is a pro-BJP twitter handle. Its tweets are often interesting and insightful.

Recently, it asked the question, "India is the only country where the Ruler community became the most backward community. Muslims from ruling to poor. Any other example?"

Many people noticed the tweet and there was some conversation too, on this topic.

Is this a pertinent and fair question? Do you feel that it happened and how? Some of you may have your own take about the query itself. I am posting it here, to find out what you guys [readers] have to say about this view.

It is not that all Muslims were powerful or that now all Muslims are POOR and Hindus are RICH. This sweeping statement [some reality and yes more in perception] is also a result of many factors.

Okay, let's first accept that Muslims were part of the ruling class and there has been a decline and analyse reasons. There are a lot of things, we need to discuss. Read up to the last point and kindly tell what's your take on it:

1. We are talking about a period of nearly three hundred years. Of course, the Muslim community had influence. This decline in power took three centuries, a gradual and long process. Following Plassey and Buxar battles, 'the power' was on the wane, even more rapidly.

2. If 'Muslims' were earlier the ruling class, did the benefits of Mughals, Afghans, Turks or Local Muslims ruling the country or principality, reach the poor Muslims, during the Sultanate and Mughal period?

There has always been the question that whether during Sultanate-Mughal,  poor Muslim had any feeling of being part of ruling class or they had no such benefits and it was that just the rulers happened to be Muslims.

3. After 1857, British targeted the Muslim rulers, rebels, aristocracy and awam, with all its might, as Muslims were seen as the main motivators behind the 'mutiny'. Mass killings continued for more than a decade and land holdings were taken away.

4. Class and caste is another aspect. For centuries, ruling class didn't even bear the sight of a local Muslim getting higher posts in administration. Among Hindus, Upper Castes were favoured, not the lower castes. The varna vyavastha--Hindu caste system, remained untouched. Muslim rule didn't benefit the Julaha or the Rangrez either. 

5. Partition is, of course, a major factor. The educated Muslim and the so-called 'elite' from North India, left for West Pakistan and also to East Pakistan. This created a void everywhere--from Army to Police, Bureaucracy to Legislatures [Parliament], everywhere.

6. Delhi and most major cities of North India, lost their Muslim domination and percentage of Muslim population dropped in these places. Muslims remained in qasbahs in Uttar Pradesh, but that doesn't matter as much.

7. Loss of 'power', the sense of resignation after partition and lack of leadership turned Muslims into a shell. Riots pushed them to 'Muslim localities' or 'ghettoes' i.e. areas with poor civic amenities. No major socio-economic-educational movements among Muslims, especially, in North India.

8. After independence, role of Congress in UP, was surprisingly at odds with its ideology and its leaders went after Muslims, something that was not witnessed in other regions of the country. Urdu was booted out of the system, jobs were denied to Muslims in the most populated state of the country. The Zamindari Abolition too hit Muslims the hardest. 'Custodian' had draconian powers to take away house and land.

9. The manner in which communal riots took place in cities after cities, destroying the Muslim businesses and cottage industries, also affected Muslims in a big way. Faced with riots, they couldn't get opportunity to flourish. Right-wing has innumerable strategies to keep Muslims on target and force them to grapple with these issues--Vande Mataram to Cow, Yoga to Saraswati Vandana, AMU to Kairana, et al.

10. These things kept Muslims bogged down and on the edge. Muslims couldn't even get their due share in the Media boom during the last two decades, which has affected them worse. Voicelessness in Media--Newspapers, TV, leads to negative coverage which hurts Muslims, even more.

1. हिंदुस्तान में मुस्लिम क़ौम को कमज़ोर होने में तक़रीबन तीन सौ साल लगे. प्लासी और बक्सर की जंगों के बाद मुसलमानों को ज़्यादा नुकसान हुआ.
2. 1857 के बाद, अंग्रेज़ों ने मुसलमानों को टारगेट किया, क्योंकि वह मानते थे कि मुसलमान क़ौम ने ही बगावत को ज़्यादा उकसाया. लाखों लोग मारे गए और जागीरें ज़ब्त की गयीं.
3. पार्टीशन की वजह से, पढ़ा लिखा मुसलमान मग़रिबी और मशरिक़ी पाकिस्तान चला गया. इससे आर्मी, पुलिस, जुडिशरी, ब्यूरोक्रेसी से मुसलमान तक़रीबन गायब हो गए.
4. शहरों से मुसलमानों के जाने की वजह से बचे हुए मुसलमानों की आवाज़ का असर कम हुआ.
5. यूपी जो हिंदुस्तान की सबसे ज़्यादा आबादी वाली रियासत है, वहां कांग्रेस का किरदार बेहद सख्त और दुसरे सूबों से अलग रहा. यह दक्षिणपंथ के विजन जैसा ही था. उर्दू को बाहर कर दिया गया. ज़मींदारी अबोलिशन और कस्टोडियन की सबसे ज़्यादा मार इसी सूबे में पडी.
6. दंगे-फसादात, उन शहरों में ज़्यादा हुए जहां मुस्लिमों के हाथ में कोई न कोई इंडस्ट्री थी. फसादात की वजह से मुसलमानों का उन बस्तियों में जाना जहां सिविक एमेनिटीज नहीं थीं, एक और नुकसानदेह पहलू था.
7. वन्दे मातरम से लेकर सरस्वती वंदना, गाय से कैराना, दक्षिणपंथी ताक़तों के पास सैकड़ों मुद्दे हैं जिससे मुसलमान हमेशा टारगेट पर रहे.
8. मगर ये भी सच है कि सही मुस्लिम लीडरशिप नहीं उभर पायी, नतीजतन, न कोई तालीमी इंक़लाब आया और न ही समाजी.
9. मीडिआ रेवोलुशन के दौर में मुसलमान पीछे रहे गए. मीडिया में मुसलमानों की कम-नुमाइंदगी और उनके हाथ में चैनल, अखबार न होना एक बड़ी वजह रही, जिससे मुसलमानों की नेगेटिव इमेज मॉस-मीडिआ के ज़रिये पेश होती रही. हालात जितने बुरे हों, उससे कई गुना बुरे दिखाये जाते रहे और ये एक बड़ा नुकसान रहा....

ہندوستان میں مسلم قوم کےزوال کی داستان تقریباً تین صدیوں پر محیط ہے۔ پلاسی اور بکسر کی جنگوں کے بعد تنزل کی رفتار اور تیز ہو گئ۔
اٹھارہ سو ستاون کے 'غدر' کے بعد انگریزوں نے مسلمانں کو ٹارگٹ کیا، کیوں کہ وہ سمجھتے تھے کہ مسلمان ہی بغاوت کا محرک تھا-
تقسیم ہند کے بعد پڑھا لکھا مسلم طبقہ پاکستان چلا گیا۔ فوج، پولس، عدلیہ، بیوروکریسی میں اس سے ایک خلا پیدا ہو گیا۔ مسلم تناسب، نوکریوں میں بیحد کم ہو گیا۔
بڑے شہروں سے مسلم انخلا کے سبب، مسلمانوں کی سیاسی اور سماجی آواز کمزور ہوئ۔
ہندوستان کی سبسے زیادہ آبادی والی ریاست اتر پردیش ہے۔ یہاں کانگریس کا رویہ ملسمانوں کے تیئں بیحد خراب تھا۔ اردو ختم کر دی گئ اور مسلمانوں پر ملازمتوں کا دروازہ بند کر دیا گیا۔
زمینداری ایبولیشن اور کسٹوڈین کی مار بھی اسی صوبہ میں تھی۔
فسادات ان شہروں میں ہوۓ جہاں مسلمانوں کے ہاتھوں میں کوئ بزنیز یا انڈسٹری تھی۔
فرقہ وارانہ فسادات کی وجہ سے مسلمان ان محلوں میں منتقل ہوا جہاں اسکی اکثریت تھی مگر بلدیہ اور حکومت کا کوئ دھیان نہ تھا۔
دایئں بازو کی تنظیموں کے پاس اتنے مدعے ہیں کہ مسلمان ہمیشہ ٹارگٹ پر رہا اور دفاع ہی کرتا رہا-
یہ بھی سچ ہے کہ مسلمان تنازعات میں الجھا رہا اور کوئ سیاسی یا تعلیمی انقلاب قوم میں نہ آ سکا۔ اسکی وجہ لیڈرشب کا پیدا نہ ہونا ہے۔
میڈیا ریوالیوشن کے دور میں مسلمان بہت پیچھے رہ گیا۔ اسکے ہاتھ میں نہ بڑے اخبار ہیں نہ چینل۔ نتیجہ یہ ہوا کہ حالات کم خراب ہوں مگر اور زیادہ خراب دکھاۓ جاتے رہے، جسکی وجہ سے منفی اثر ہوا اور مسلمانوں کی شبیہ کو سخت نقصان پہنچا۔

Tuesday, July 12, 2016

Muslim couple defies curfew, walks for miles to provide food to Hindu family in Kashmir: Communal Harmony Project-6

After Hizbul Mujahideen commander Burhan Wani's killing in an encounter with security forces, Jammu and Kashmir is on the boil.

Dozens of youths have died in firing and scores have their vision affected as pellets hit their eyes.

Curfew has been enforced in many parts of the valley.

Besides, this is the period when Amarnath Yatra has already begun.

Amid reports of deaths and gloom, there are also stories from the region that show how people risk their lives for the sake humanity, even in such a situation.


This Kashmiri Muslim couple braved a strict curfew to take food to his Kashmiri Pandit family's house. Zubaida Begam and her husband walked for miles, risking lives, after receiving telephone from across Jhelum river from the KP friend, reports India Today.

Diwan Chand and his family, including an ailing grandmother, were desperate for help as crisis mounted in the Valley. Shops were shut, no transport and curfew was imposed. Yet, they managed to reach Diwan Chand Pandit's house, with the ration.

The truth is that there are innumerable examples of communal harmony in our day to day live and we all are aware.

But negative truth travels faster and makes greater impact. We must not let the bad stories overshadow the good and positive aspects of our society.

Thank you, India Today, for highlighting a good story about the relations, closeness of people on the ground. The original story is here.

[Harmony exists all around us but is often ignored. Instead, stories of hate, discord and communalism get spread easily.

There are a million examples in our daily lives across India but they don't get promoted, hence, news of hate and discord gets heard more. Let's change it, now. This is a small attempt to change it through Communal Harmony Project]

For reading similar reports on this blog, Click HERE

#communalharmony #communalharmonyproject #india

[Photos courtesy, LINK to sotry: India Today]

Tuesday, July 05, 2016

Indian Muslims have been most vocal against terrorism: From Fatwas against terror to refusal to bury terrorists

Lot of 'prominent' people keep making this ridiculous charge, "You guys [Muslims] don't condemn terror". 

Actor Irrfan Khan recently said that Muslims are silent about terror attack. 


Really it's shocking when people say that Muslims don't speak up.


We have suffered, are suffering, so much because of it. And yes, Indian Muslims have been the most vocal in not just condemning but acting against terror. 


If you don't see your have fault in your eyes. Chamman Miyan doesn't know how to hold candle light vigil so his protests are ignored. 


But Ulema gather for anti-terror conferences, Muslims publicly cursed terrorists, the biggest fatwa against ISIS was issued in India, protests held in dozens of cities over the years. Muslims even refused burial to terrorists in graveyards. 


Ordinary Muslims have nothing to do with international politics. Are people of other faiths expected to come on streets to protest right-wing group's acts or is there pressure on them to speak up?. Muslims don't need to say it every day,  yet, Muslims are saying it loudly, clearly.


Yet, it's so easy to say.


LINKS:


1. Dont say Muslims don't act against terror. "No burial of terrorists on sacred soil of India"

http://www.anindianmuslim.com/2008/12/no-burial-of-terrorists-on-sacred-soil.html
&
2. Chamman Miyan gets no attention. He doesn't know that candle light vigils work for media 
http://www.anindianmuslim.com/2008/09/muslims-against-terrorism.html
&
3. Fatwa against ISIS from Indian Ulema. Who says Muslims don't condemn terrorism? 
http://www.anindianmuslim.com/2015/11/1050-muslim-clerics-fatwa-against-isis.html
&
4. These are images of India. Muslims on streets in Mumbai. Fatwa by 1,000 Ulema against ISIS 
http://www.anindianmuslim.com/2016/01/indian-muslims-against-isis-after.html
&
5. "Muslims don't condemn terrorists"? Everyday. Here, thousands of Indian Ulema in 2008 
http://www.anindianmuslim.com/2008/11/indian-muslims-ulema-lead-in-terror.html

Saturday, July 02, 2016

Hockey legend Muhammad Shahid's dribbling artistry: Remembering golden era of Indian hockey and how cricket eclipsed the national sport

Indian hockey legend Muhammad Shahid is ill. In some reports, it was mentioned that 'guzre daur ke hockey khiladi' as if it was half-a-century ago.

Shahid played international hockey till late 80s, almost the era when Gavaskar had retired and Tendulkar was arriving on the cricket scene.

Shahid's electrifying presence on the field and his dribbling, made him a national hero.

India was down 0-3 to Holland in the epic match, people had turned off TVs and radios, and in the last three minutes, Shahid, Marvyn Fernandes, Carvalho turned the game with four goals, and we had won [Year 88?, if I am wrong please correct].

I still remember the adrenaline rush, yes, it happened watching or listening to commentary of hockey matches then. The feeling after the sensation win among crowd and across the country, was indescribable.

But times had changed. After that, such euphoria was only reserved for cricket wins. Shahid was ranked one of the best forwards and was named along with Stefan Blotcher, Ric Charlesworth and Hasan Sardar [Pakistan].

Everyone remembers how after losing the series to India, Hasan Sardar had famously said that, "we have lost to Shahid". Siddharth Saxena in his article reminisces how Hasan Sardar was furious as "Shahid, the genius dribbler, would push the ball between Sardar's legs and then drew it back", something that frustrated the famed player.

Forgotten Folklore

Hockey is our national game. We no longer talk about hockey folklore--Moscow Olympic gold & World cup-Champions trophy performances though cricket world cup of 1979 and 1983 are discussed all the time.

Hockey was national game but TV had stopped paying attention to it. Unlike cricket, money was not coming in. It was common to complain that tiny Holland had 125 astro turfs and India had just 4-1/2.

No wonder, even the era that is not so distant past, is being termed a 'long lost forgotten era'.
Shahid remained in his beloved Benares [Varanasi] and never cared for post-retirement glory, lived away from limelight in his city. Praying for his long life.

Tendency to believe rumours, false propaganda is worrying: From Facebook hoaxes to propaganda during communal tension, riots

Why do we so easily believe rumours [afwah], false information, especially, those that talk about something bad, without demanding any proof.

For weeks, the hoax [two different ones] about FB privacy settings continued to circulate and people readily believed them, without even asking anyone, questioning or reading the articles that clearly said that this is hoax & denied by Facebook.

Even today, people keep posting the 'notices' about their privacy. Why do we fall for wrong information, propaganda, news about some impeding doom, so promptly?

Is it about our society? Or something about human mind. Just like in times of communal tension, many believe firmly whatever rumours that circulate.

Worst propaganda is readily accepted as truth while reality in front of your eyes, you ignore and doesn't hit you hard enough to make an impression on mind.

In this case, where people feared that Facebook would bypass their security and privacy settings to reveal their photographs, they should have realised that even if it were true, posting such content on your timeline won't help.

Facebook won't be reading individual posts and IT WAS NOT A PETITION, signing which would be understandable. Still, either on the streets or social media, people react strangely, believing things without verifying or checking.

Don't fall prey to rumours during communal tension

I remember, long back during a communal riot, there was a rumour that girls of one community were targeted and their breasts were severed by members of other community.

The rumour was readily believed by the sanest people. In every household people were talking about it and it circulated in both communities, who believed that an incident had occurred and both felt that victims were 'their girls' and 'assailants were other'

Does human brain fall for dark things & is more prone to believing untrue, far-fetched, things?