[Adult rating]
The immensely loveable Suha Mujaddidi was a unique Urdu litterateur in the sense that he was just 4 feet and too fair. Unless somebody knew him, they mistook him for a 10-11 year-old boy.
Owing to his tremendous talent and knowlege he was fondly called Maulana Suha but another aspect of his life that attracts me was his colourful personality. Once on a visit to Lucknow, the group of litterateurs went to renowned tawaif-turned-radio artiste Gauhar Jaan's kotha.
Upon seeing her teenaged daughter, Soha rushed towards her and in a fraction of secod entered into her gharara (lehanga). There was no light and the mom-daughter screamed...'Haai bhutna ghus gaya hai'. Everybody was laughing and when after sometime the mom-daughter were explained they were also giggling.
Another eminent cleric was part of the group and though I wouldn't name him, the fact is that any scholar can be colourful. In those pre-partition days Aalims could be quite funny and interesting. One doesn't need to make a serious or arrogant face if he is a scholar.
Suha was married to a tall and huge Pathan woman and Suha was an exponent of 'gaali' (Urdu laced with Persian expletives). He often hurled choicest and newly-invented gaalis. When angry, his amazonian wife, often lifted him and make him sit on the high loft. He would beg not to repeat the mistake and when brought down, again abused.
[Though in a list of Indians who gave innovative 'gaali' Suha can't find a place easily. Nizam, Abdul Rab Nishtar and Hamidullah Khan were on the top of an oral list compiled and reproduced often in Urdu books of the past].
Khair, Suha was a complex and interesting personality. He often begged women for 'bosa' (kiss). Often tawaifs and someother elder women who were equally colourful and charmed by his boyish looks obliged him. He never cared for princes, rajas and nawabs and spoke his mind, even abused the mighty nawabs.
Example:
A Nawab--Maulana mehfil mein khalal mat paida kijiye
Suha--Mehfil ki to MKC*
Nawab--Mualana mere viqaar/vaqaar ka to khayaal rakhiye, aap ki zubaan...
Suha--Aap kee viqaar ki MKC aur aap ki bi MKC aur.....
Nawab--Haaieen.......(shell-shocked)
Suha, moves out leaving everybody stunned
But then the rulers of the erstwhile princely states who played host to him were also aware of his literary stature. Ironically, Suha died in misery. In a government hospital waitinf for medicines and proper medical care. The literary world cried and there was a feeling of outrage.
Bhopal Nawab Hamidullah Khan faced lot of criticism and embarrassment. The last rites were conducted by the state. But few remember Suha today. His Sharah-e-Ghalib was a pioneering work in that era. Ah! They were scholarly, they were social, lovable and also had all traits--positive and negative--which humans have.
Zameen kha gayee aasmaa.n kaise kaise
(*MKC is the Urdu variant of moth*r fu**er)
Tuesday, June 06, 2006
Getting into girl's gharara
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)






8 comments:
Somehow I dont find any taste and appreciation or any amusement in such corny behaviour - even if it happens to be a philosopher or a great writer...
Reminds us of the era of decadent nawabs of old.
Although perhaps I should'nt be judgemntal I agree with sb that because someone is of literary bent you should'nt excuse such corny behaviour .
nice one...
Litterateurs are also human beings, often more sensitive and have complex personalities, grappling with deprivation on one hand and applause on the other. However, is is better than leading dual lives wearing a mask. What one is, he is.
SB made another comment on the post. Unfortunately he misunderstood the word deprivation and probably got confused with depravity and that's why wrote depravation (which is no word at all). The correct word is deprave behaviour and depravity. I was talking about mahroomi (deprivation) while trying to analyse. Probably that was why he flew off at a tangent. I am sorry for deleting the comment but please sb read carefully before commenting.
Adnan
I am not sure why you made so much of a small spelling mistake. Unfortunately, blogspot comment entry doesnt do a spell check - like most tools we are used to nowadays.
Spelling issue aside, I still stand by my point. Creative persons using such garbs to justify corny or unethical behaviour isnt justifiable. Deprivation and acclaim together are no reason for someone to get weird. Recently saw such a creative person on a TV debate (post Rahul Mahajan) episode justify the common use of drugs in their parties with the excuse that creative people need it. To my common sense, its depravity in the garb of a license derived out of creativity. Remember the Danish cartoonist who crossed the line and depecited prophet or the Indian artist who painted nude godesses - all under license of creativity. Its no different...
No dear, I don't justify that at all.
Post a Comment